Microsoft Office 2003 Serial Integrated Science' title='Microsoft Office 2003 Serial Integrated Science' />This July, we asked for software tips from the 2017 Microsoft Office National Champions, a set of charming teens who are officially the best at using PowerPoint, Word. HP Touch. Pad Needs 6 to 8 Weeks for Additional Shipments. Hewlett Packard will apparently need close to two months to start fulfilling backorders for the temporarily revived Touch. COR_HHvHOPBTXN3Kp-d4Q_Yvbw=/735x0/image-235-570088d55f9b5861952da938.png' alt='Microsoft Office 2003 Serial Integrated Science' title='Microsoft Office 2003 Serial Integrated Science' />Pad tablet. It will take 6 8 weeks to build enough HP Touch. Pads to meet our current commitments, during which time your order will then ship from this stock with free ground shipping, read an email sent to customers and reprinted in a Sept. Precentral. net blog. You will receive a shipping notification with a tracking number once your order has shipped. That would place the new Touch. Pads in consumers hands sometime in either late October or early November. The reduced price devices are not returnable, according to the email. Youre currently subscribed to some eWEEK features and just need to create a username and password. HP originally acquired web. OS as part of its takeover of Palm in 2. The manufacturer originally had big plans for loading the operating system onto a variety of devices, including tablets, smartphones, desktops and laptops. However, sales of its Touch. Pad proved anemic, and HP made the decision to end the tablets life after a mere six weeks on the market. In order to clear out inventory, the manufacturer sliced the starting price to 9. In the wake of that, HP made the decision to revive the line for a limited time. In addition, HP plans on dividing its web. OS arm into two separate units reporting to different areas of the company, according to two leaked memos that have made their way onto the Web. The web. OS software assets will find their way into the arms, however welcoming, of its Office of Strategy and Technology. The other parts of the web. OS corporate infrastructure, presumably including its hardware interests, will continue as part of the Personal Systems Group, which manufactures HPs PCs, and which will presumably be spun off into its own entity under the terms of the companys new strategy. We have decided that well be most effective in these efforts by having the teams in web. OS software engineering, worldwide developer relations and web. OS software product marketing join the Office of Strategy and Technology, Todd Bradley, executive vice president of HPs Personal Systems Group, wrote in an email circulated to the web. OS developer team and also leaked onto Precentral. The remainder of the web. OS team, under Stephen De. Witt, will continue to report into PSG. According to at least one analyst, flooding the market with additional Touch. Pad devices could have significant benefits for HP going forward. A larger installed base of Touch. Pad and web. OS devices should increase the value of web. OS in a potential sale, Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu wrote in a research note widely circulated on Barrons and other financial Websites. We believe logical buyers may include Samsung Electronics, Research In Motion, HTC, Amazon. Facebook, Sony, Microsoft and others. Follow Nicholas Kolakowski on Twitter. Men Have Always Used Science to Explain Why Theyre Better Than Women. On Saturday, Gizmodo published a 1. Are Microsoft Outlook Tasks Private Health. Google software engineer James Damore blasting the companys diversity policies. In the now viral document entitled Googles Ideological Echo Chamber, Damore asserts that women are biologically ill equipped to handle the rigors of the tech industry. The encouraging news is that Damore has now been fired from Google, according to multiple news reports. Sadly, the ideas espoused in his letter echo the same pseudoscience peddled by eugenicists and white supremacists for decadesand theyre unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Many ideas embraced by this ex Google employee are based largely on the so called conclusions of evolutionary psychology, a field premised on the idea that our psychological traits are the product of the same natural selection that shaped early human evolution. In practice, evolutionary psychology has been used to justify everything from rape to claims that certain groups of people are inherently more intelligent than others. It has also been criticized for shoddy methodology, ignoring cultural context, and leaping to conclusions on inadequate evidence. Evolutionary psychologists have tried to use their science to determine the best way to seduce women, which they think can be gamed out like Battleship. The fields fraught and controversial history didnt stop Damore from espousing some evolutionary psych of his own, to justify the underrepresentation of women at an enormous technology company. On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways, Damore wrote. These differences arent just socially constructed because for one thing they often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone. Citing something like prenatal testosterone to justify why more men occupy leadership positions in tech reads like classic evolutionary psychology using a vaguely scientific andcontroversial concept to explain an incredibly complex, multifaceted issue. But in evolutionary psychology, many differences between genders in our society including deep inequities can be neatly explained away by hard wired differences in in our brains. We need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism, Damore wrote, citing pseudoscientific claims that men get paid more because they have a higher drive for status instead of the overwhelming evidence that gender based discrimination is closely linked to the wage gap. Of course, using science to justify male superiority is much older than anything espoused by evolutionary psychologists. The idea that women are less psychologically stableor more, bluntly, hystericalhas been around at least since Hippocrates wrote about it in the 5th century BCE. As Freud and his contemporaries later posited, womens biology explained their inherent insanity. Or, as this particular Google employee called it, their neuroticism. Women, on average, have more neuroticism higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance, Damore wrote. This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs. Its true that women are more likely than men to be anxious, but theyre also more likely to have experienced physical and emotional abuse, both of which contribute to anxiety, for obvious reasons. So the claim that women are neurotic without any context as to whypossibly some differences in brain chemistry, but also, just maybe, greater levels of sexual harassment and social isolation in the workplaceis misleading and frankly, insulting. And while Damore wasnt so extreme as to claim women should be extirpated from the tech world, some of his pseudoscientific notions about why men are inherently better suited to certain jobs ring strongly of eugenics, a school of thinking premised on the idea that certain groups are biologically superior to others. Damore argues that highly heritable personality traits including higher agreeableness and a preference for artistic jobs among women are responsible for gender gaps in tech, ignoring cultural explanations. By this logic, attempting to level the playing field for women is thus misguidedwe should be selecting candidates read men with the most desirable traits for high stress, technically demanding jobs. Perhaps its no coincidence that some evolutionary psychologists have expressed support for the idea of modern eugenics projects. While technology changes and the science evolves, the inclination to use biological differences as an excuse for discrimination remains the same. And while the Google screed focused largely on gender, many of these same arguments have been used to justify racism. I would argue in fact that the whole idea of whiteness and white supremacy wouldnt exist without science, Dr. Chanda Prescod Weinstein, a theoretical astrophysicist at the University of Washington, told Gizmodo, noting that the European Enlightenment spawned the now widely debunked field of scientific racism. As much as the Google employees anti diversity letter reeks of centuries old junk science, its important to emphasize that even today women, non binary people, and people of color in STEM fields are still regularly confronted with bigoted attitudes wrapped in a guise of biology. All too often, these people fear being blacklisted within their industry if they speak out against workplace discrimination. Oddly enough, the same white men who dominate tech industry in numbers seem to have convinced themselves theyre the ones whose status in the workplace is being threatened. Ironicallyas Damores manifesto and the subsequent fallout now illustratethey may be their own worst enemy.